<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iPad: A Sentimental Journey, Quantified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.springcreekgroup.com/blog/apple-ipad-sentiment-quantified/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.springcreekgroup.com/blog/apple-ipad-sentiment-quantified?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apple-ipad-sentiment-quantified</link>
	<description>Seattle Social Media Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Naslund</title>
		<link>http://www.springcreekgroup.com/blog/apple-ipad-sentiment-quantified/comment-page-1#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Naslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.springcreekgroup.com/?p=2272#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Hey guys - good stuff, and I love your take on sentiment here:

&quot;So what we find most-actionable is using this data in a directional sense to determine whether a product launch, event, marketing campaign or meme is gaining traction or increasing its velocity in a positive or negative sense.&quot;

The best and most positive (pardon the pun) use for sentiment, in our view, is trend identification, and broad indicators in aggregate. And there&#039;s little doubt that while the machines can help us take a first pass at sentiment, humans ultimately need to make a judgment call as to whether the buzz on the social web is pushing them closer to their business goals.

Thanks for the discussion.

Best,
Amber Naslund
Director of Community, Radian6
@ambercadabra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys &#8211; good stuff, and I love your take on sentiment here:</p>
<p>&#8220;So what we find most-actionable is using this data in a directional sense to determine whether a product launch, event, marketing campaign or meme is gaining traction or increasing its velocity in a positive or negative sense.&#8221;</p>
<p>The best and most positive (pardon the pun) use for sentiment, in our view, is trend identification, and broad indicators in aggregate. And there&#8217;s little doubt that while the machines can help us take a first pass at sentiment, humans ultimately need to make a judgment call as to whether the buzz on the social web is pushing them closer to their business goals.</p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Amber Naslund<br />
Director of Community, Radian6<br />
@ambercadabra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.springcreekgroup.com/blog/apple-ipad-sentiment-quantified/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.springcreekgroup.com/?p=2272#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys. Good post. This is an important issue. Too often people who run your campaign AND do the analytics al a carte measurement tools that favor the conclussion, &quot;We did a great job.&quot; I&#039;d love to move toward standardization and transparent third party analytics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys. Good post. This is an important issue. Too often people who run your campaign AND do the analytics al a carte measurement tools that favor the conclussion, &#8220;We did a great job.&#8221; I&#8217;d love to move toward standardization and transparent third party analytics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

